-19.4%
GFS vs LDOS
+39.7%
-59.1%
-51.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +0.5% | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -5.4% | +6.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +4.9% | -13.5% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -46.5% | +7.2% | -53.7% | -45.8% |
| 6M | -4.8% | -24.2% | +19.4% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +29.7% | -25.8% | +55.5% | +32.8% |
| 1Y | +35.8% | -24.7% | +60.6% | +38.6% |
| All | -19.4% | +39.7% | -59.1% | -20.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling