+27.2%
GFS vs FROG
+85.3%
-58.0%
-59.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +2.7% | -5.4% | -3.1% |
| 7D | +7.4% | +12.5% | -5.1% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -15.3% | +23.5% | -38.8% | -18.3% |
| 3M | -21.1% | +19.4% | -40.5% | -23.9% |
| 6M | -44.5% | +77.0% | -121.5% | -48.5% |
| YTD | +19.2% | +81.9% | -62.6% | +11.4% |
| 1Y | +27.2% | +90.7% | -63.4% | +19.6% |
| All | +27.2% | +85.3% | -58.0% | +19.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling