+37.1%
GFS vs BIIB
+51.8%
-14.7%
-51.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -3.8% | +3.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -1.6% | +4.3% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -16.4% | +2.2% | -18.6% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -41.6% | +10.3% | -51.9% | -43.1% |
| 6M | -3.7% | +14.9% | -18.6% | -7.8% |
| YTD | +29.3% | +20.7% | +8.6% | +21.9% |
| 1Y | +37.1% | +50.3% | -13.2% | +29.5% |
| All | +37.1% | +51.8% | -14.7% | +29.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling