-50.7%
GFS vs ABCL
+120.4%
-171.1%
-59.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.9% | -9.4% | -0.5% | -8.3% |
| 7D | -20.7% | -14.9% | -5.8% | -18.7% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -15.4% | -9.9% | -23.4% |
| 3M | -26.3% | +88.0% | -114.3% | -34.9% |
| 6M | -50.7% | +138.8% | -189.5% | -61.1% |
| All | -50.7% | +120.4% | -171.1% | -61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling