+57.7%
GEN vs ALHC
+136.3%
-78.6%
-43.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | 0.0% | -2.1% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -0.6% | -0.6% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +10.1% | -1.0% | +11.2% | +10.1% |
| 3M | +16.1% | -10.2% | +26.2% | +16.3% |
| 6M | +38.9% | -28.3% | +67.1% | +40.1% |
| YTD | +14.4% | -31.4% | +45.9% | +15.5% |
| 1Y | +5.9% | -16.9% | +22.8% | +5.9% |
| All | +57.7% | +136.3% | -78.6% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling