-22.4%
GEHC vs UMAC
+488.3%
-510.7%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -3.2% | +1.8% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -7.9% | -4.0% | -3.9% | -7.8% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -9.4% | -2.3% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +0.8% | +3.0% | -2.2% | +0.5% |
| 6M | -11.6% | +27.2% | -38.8% | -13.1% |
| YTD | -21.6% | +84.7% | -106.3% | -24.0% |
| 1Y | -15.3% | +136.5% | -151.8% | -18.9% |
| All | -22.4% | +488.3% | -510.7% | -31.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling