+37.3%
GEHC vs NOC
+9.7%
+27.6%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.3% | -0.6% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.3% | +4.5% | -6.8% | -2.8% |
| 30D | +19.0% | +14.1% | +5.0% | +17.1% |
| 3M | +13.3% | -4.5% | +17.7% | +13.8% |
| 6M | +31.5% | -0.8% | +32.3% | +31.4% |
| YTD | 0.0% | -2.5% | +2.5% | -0.9% |
| 1Y | +9.4% | -0.1% | +9.5% | +8.0% |
| 3Y | +18.3% | +24.6% | -6.3% | +13.1% |
| All | +37.3% | +9.7% | +27.6% | +28.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling