-21.1%
GEHC vs MULL
+2,481.0%
-2,502.2%
-37.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -3.0% | 0.0% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -5.2% | +14.0% | -19.2% | -5.8% |
| 30D | -7.0% | +24.8% | -31.8% | -8.1% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -16.1% | +19.4% | +1.1% |
| 6M | -10.0% | +330.9% | -340.9% | -28.0% |
| YTD | -18.5% | +545.0% | -563.5% | -39.2% |
| 1Y | -14.4% | +2,427.1% | -2,441.5% | -49.2% |
| All | -21.1% | +2,481.0% | -2,502.2% | -60.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling