-1.7%
GEHC vs FND
-50.0%
+48.4%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.7% | -1.7% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -0.8% | -6.9% | -7.5% |
| 30D | -10.7% | -19.6% | +8.9% | -4.7% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -4.3% | +3.1% | -1.3% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -20.4% | +6.7% | -9.1% |
| YTD | -20.4% | -21.9% | +1.4% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -17.0% | -45.2% | +28.1% | -2.7% |
| All | -1.7% | -50.0% | +48.4% | +12.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling