+280.4%
GE vs LII
+5.3%
+275.1%
-21.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +1.2% | -0.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -0.7% | -0.9% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -12.6% | +1.0% | -7.3% |
| 3M | +3.0% | -24.4% | +27.5% | +12.4% |
| 6M | -0.5% | -28.7% | +28.2% | +10.3% |
| YTD | +9.7% | -19.1% | +28.9% | +16.2% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | -29.7% | +49.7% | +33.0% |
| All | +280.4% | +5.3% | +275.1% | +263.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling