+261.3%
GE vs IEMG
+81.5%
+179.9%
-21.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -2.0% | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -0.9% | -1.9% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -11.9% | +2.1% | -14.0% | -13.2% |
| 3M | +1.8% | +4.6% | -2.8% | -2.0% |
| 6M | -0.6% | +14.0% | -14.6% | -10.9% |
| YTD | +5.5% | +22.3% | -16.8% | -10.2% |
| 1Y | +15.0% | +30.7% | -15.7% | -6.7% |
| All | +261.3% | +81.5% | +179.9% | +122.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling