+284.1%
GE vs CTAS
+66.0%
+218.1%
-21.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.3% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -1.8% | +0.2% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -0.2% | -11.4% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +3.0% | +11.7% | -8.7% | -2.6% |
| 6M | -0.5% | +0.7% | -1.2% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +9.7% | +7.4% | +2.3% | +5.5% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | -2.1% | +22.1% | +20.6% |
| All | +284.1% | +66.0% | +218.1% | +182.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling