+42.5%
GDXJ vs UMC
+238.8%
-196.3%
-41.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +2.4% | -1.3% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.8% | +9.0% | -11.8% | -4.6% |
| 30D | +5.0% | +17.2% | -12.3% | +1.1% |
| 3M | +24.1% | +11.4% | +12.7% | +16.7% |
| 6M | -7.4% | +137.5% | -144.9% | -33.3% |
| YTD | +10.2% | +193.1% | -182.9% | -28.2% |
| 1Y | +42.5% | +240.3% | -197.8% | -19.1% |
| All | +42.5% | +238.8% | -196.3% | -19.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling