+281.7%
GDXJ vs ENB
+69.7%
+212.0%
-41.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.0% | -3.8% | -0.1% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -6.2% | -4.6% | -1.7% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -5.2% | +9.8% | +7.4% |
| 3M | +31.3% | -13.4% | +44.7% | +41.8% |
| 6M | -10.7% | -7.8% | -2.9% | -8.3% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +4.9% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| 1Y | +44.1% | +3.2% | +40.9% | +35.1% |
| All | +281.7% | +69.7% | +212.0% | +142.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling