+258.1%
GDX vs MTZ
+160.8%
+97.4%
-38.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -2.2% | +3.3% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +2.3% | -0.4% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -10.3% | +20.2% | +12.3% |
| 3M | +28.2% | -31.8% | +60.0% | +37.6% |
| 6M | -2.9% | -19.2% | +16.3% | +0.5% |
| YTD | +16.0% | +10.7% | +5.2% | +12.9% |
| 1Y | +49.9% | +37.5% | +12.3% | +40.3% |
| All | +258.1% | +160.8% | +97.4% | +189.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling