+227.1%
GDX vs FLNC
-69.8%
+296.9%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -8.3% | +9.4% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -4.2% | +6.1% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -20.0% | +29.9% | +11.9% |
| 3M | +28.2% | -56.9% | +85.1% | +36.6% |
| 6M | -2.9% | -35.5% | +32.6% | -1.7% |
| YTD | +16.0% | -48.8% | +64.8% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +49.9% | +49.3% | +0.6% | +39.8% |
| 3Y | +263.6% | -61.8% | +325.3% | +258.9% |
| All | +227.1% | -69.8% | +296.9% | +208.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling