+258.1%
GDX vs ENPH
-70.0%
+328.1%
-38.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -5.4% | +6.5% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +3.4% | -1.5% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +9.9% | -10.3% | +20.2% | +11.2% |
| 3M | +28.2% | -31.4% | +59.6% | +33.1% |
| 6M | -2.9% | -10.1% | +7.2% | -2.9% |
| YTD | +16.0% | +14.6% | +1.4% | +12.3% |
| 1Y | +49.9% | -3.2% | +53.1% | +46.9% |
| All | +258.1% | -70.0% | +328.1% | +278.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling