+12.8%
GDDY vs NIO
-38.3%
+51.2%
-65.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -2.4% | +3.1% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -4.1% | -4.0% | -7.9% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -23.2% | +25.5% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -29.9% | +44.7% | +17.3% |
| 6M | +2.1% | -25.1% | +27.2% | +3.4% |
| YTD | -24.6% | -27.5% | +2.9% | -23.5% |
| 1Y | -37.1% | -41.1% | +4.0% | -35.6% |
| 3Y | +25.5% | -63.1% | +88.7% | +29.1% |
| 5Y | +24.2% | -90.4% | +114.6% | +35.2% |
| All | +12.8% | -38.3% | +51.2% | +8.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling