+70.8%
GD vs TNA
+102.0%
-31.2%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +0.7% | -2.5% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -0.1% | -5.2% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -4.9% | -1.5% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +5.7% | +0.4% | +5.3% | +5.2% |
| 6M | -0.9% | +32.5% | -33.5% | -5.4% |
| YTD | +8.2% | +53.7% | -45.6% | +1.2% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | +65.1% | -51.7% | +4.8% |
| All | +70.8% | +102.0% | -31.2% | +52.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling