+70.8%
GD vs STZ
-47.3%
+118.0%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.7% | -1.1% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -1.9% | -3.3% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -1.9% | -4.5% | -6.2% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -6.2% | +11.9% | +6.4% |
| 6M | -0.9% | -14.0% | +13.1% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +8.2% | -5.1% | +13.3% | +7.7% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -9.6% | +23.0% | +13.8% |
| All | +70.8% | -47.3% | +118.0% | +81.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling