+54.9%
GD vs PHM
+67.6%
-12.8%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PHM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.6% | -1.7% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -3.9% | +8.7% | -12.6% | -5.0% |
| 30D | +8.1% | +16.4% | -8.3% | +5.9% |
| 3M | -6.8% | +1.8% | -8.6% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +3.0% | +15.1% | -12.1% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +7.8% | +16.0% | -8.2% | +4.9% |
| 1Y | +5.8% | +14.1% | -8.3% | +3.1% |
| All | +54.9% | +67.6% | -12.8% | +44.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PHM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PHM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PHM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PHM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling