+70.8%
GD vs NVT
+183.2%
-112.4%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +2.6% | -4.4% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -5.3% | +5.1% | -10.3% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -3.7% | -2.7% | -6.2% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -10.1% | +15.8% | +6.2% |
| 6M | -0.9% | +37.5% | -38.4% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +8.2% | +53.7% | -45.6% | +1.1% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | +70.9% | -57.4% | +4.4% |
| All | +70.8% | +183.2% | -112.4% | +45.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling