+97.2%
GD vs NIO
-90.7%
+187.9%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.6% | -0.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -13.0% | +7.8% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -18.3% | +11.9% | -6.0% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -33.2% | +38.9% | +6.7% |
| 6M | -0.9% | -21.5% | +20.5% | -0.6% |
| YTD | +8.2% | -25.5% | +33.6% | +8.6% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -38.0% | +51.4% | +14.4% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | -65.5% | +133.9% | +70.9% |
| All | +97.2% | -90.7% | +187.9% | +102.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling