+58.6%
GD vs LDOS
+35.2%
+23.3%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | +0.7% | -3.3% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -2.8% | +5.8% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +10.5% | +13.6% | -3.1% | +5.6% |
| 3M | -5.0% | +4.2% | -9.2% | -6.7% |
| 6M | +5.5% | -8.2% | +13.7% | +7.8% |
| YTD | +10.3% | -24.1% | +34.4% | +20.3% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | -31.2% | +39.4% | +22.2% |
| All | +58.6% | +35.2% | +23.3% | +41.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling