+97.2%
GD vs LCID
-97.6%
+194.9%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.7% | -3.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -6.6% | +1.3% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -30.1% | +23.7% | -5.6% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -17.6% | +23.3% | +5.7% |
| 6M | -0.9% | -54.4% | +53.5% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +8.2% | -55.7% | +63.9% | +9.8% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -71.0% | +84.5% | +16.1% |
| 3Y | +68.5% | -92.6% | +161.1% | +75.6% |
| All | +97.2% | -97.6% | +194.9% | +113.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling