+56.2%
GD vs GFS
-19.0%
+75.2%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.7% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +7.4% | -4.7% | +2.3% |
| 30D | +8.6% | -15.3% | +23.9% | +9.3% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -21.1% | +14.0% | -6.2% |
| 6M | +7.5% | -44.5% | +51.9% | +9.6% |
| YTD | +9.9% | +19.2% | -9.3% | +4.4% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | +27.2% | -19.7% | +1.4% |
| 3Y | +56.2% | -20.1% | +76.3% | +49.5% |
| All | +56.2% | -19.0% | +75.2% | +49.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling