+70.8%
GD vs CMS
+36.5%
+34.3%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.2% | -1.6% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -5.3% | +0.4% | -5.6% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -6.4% | -3.6% | -2.8% | -5.5% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -1.9% | +7.6% | +6.0% |
| 6M | -0.9% | -11.0% | +10.0% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +8.2% | +0.2% | +8.0% | +7.5% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -1.3% | +14.7% | +13.2% |
| All | +70.8% | +36.5% | +34.3% | +58.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling