+70.8%
GD vs APTV
-53.8%
+124.6%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +3.1% | -4.8% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -5.3% | +4.8% | -10.1% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -6.4% | +2.0% | -8.4% | -6.7% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -34.2% | +39.9% | +9.9% |
| 6M | -0.9% | -34.7% | +33.7% | +2.9% |
| YTD | +8.2% | -37.0% | +45.1% | +12.7% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -40.4% | +53.8% | +18.9% |
| All | +70.8% | -53.8% | +124.6% | +80.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling