+141.6%
FTNT vs ZM
+34.4%
+107.2%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.3% | +0.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +0.3% | +1.4% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -10.3% | +6.0% | -0.6% |
| 3M | +13.6% | -0.7% | +14.3% | +13.2% |
| 6M | +87.6% | +24.8% | +62.8% | +71.5% |
| YTD | +98.0% | +11.5% | +86.5% | +87.1% |
| 1Y | +96.9% | +12.3% | +84.6% | +84.8% |
| All | +141.6% | +34.4% | +107.2% | +114.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling