+142.0%
FTNT vs RMD
+51.8%
+90.2%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -3.2% | +4.0% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -4.5% | +1.8% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +4.6% | -6.0% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +10.1% | +14.8% | -4.7% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +88.2% | -12.1% | +100.3% | +92.7% |
| YTD | +98.3% | -7.5% | +105.8% | +100.8% |
| 1Y | +96.0% | -20.1% | +116.0% | +104.1% |
| All | +142.0% | +51.8% | +90.2% | +128.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling