+96.9%
FTNT vs REPL
+136.9%
-40.0%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | REPL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -2.2% | +2.0% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -9.6% | +11.3% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -4.3% | +5.7% | -10.0% | -4.5% |
| 3M | +13.6% | +56.4% | -42.8% | +10.4% |
| 6M | +87.6% | +67.4% | +20.2% | +79.8% |
| YTD | +98.0% | +48.7% | +49.3% | +89.9% |
| 1Y | +96.9% | +148.3% | -51.4% | +86.3% |
| All | +96.9% | +136.9% | -40.0% | +86.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside REPL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus REPL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × REPL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded REPL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling