+58.5%
FTNT vs PLTD
-77.8%
+136.3%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +4.6% | -4.7% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -5.8% | +5.9% | -11.8% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -11.6% | +6.8% | -6.9% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -29.9% | +34.4% | -1.3% |
| 6M | +88.8% | -28.5% | +117.3% | +81.7% |
| YTD | +96.8% | -20.4% | +117.2% | +95.9% |
| 1Y | +104.5% | -33.3% | +137.7% | +97.2% |
| All | +58.5% | -77.8% | +136.3% | +18.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling