+97.2%
FTNT vs PCG
+2.9%
+94.4%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +3.6% | -2.9% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +5.4% | -8.1% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -15.1% | +13.8% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +10.1% | -9.8% | +19.9% | +9.7% |
| 6M | +88.2% | -18.0% | +106.2% | +87.5% |
| YTD | +98.3% | -7.2% | +105.5% | +96.5% |
| All | +97.2% | +2.9% | +94.4% | +92.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling