+92.9%
FTNT vs OMC
+7.0%
+85.9%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | OMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.6% | -1.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -4.4% | +4.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -3.0% | -7.6% | +4.6% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +4.5% | +3.1% | +6.9% |
| 6M | +87.0% | -0.3% | +87.2% | +86.0% |
| YTD | +96.5% | -0.1% | +96.7% | +93.4% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +4.6% | +88.3% | +89.2% |
| All | +92.9% | +7.0% | +85.9% | +89.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside OMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus OMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × OMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded OMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling