+148.8%
FTNT vs NIO
-90.7%
+239.5%
-38.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.6% | +1.5% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -5.8% | -13.0% | +7.2% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -18.3% | +13.5% | -2.3% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -33.2% | +37.6% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +88.8% | -21.5% | +110.3% | +92.9% |
| YTD | +96.8% | -25.5% | +122.3% | +102.0% |
| 1Y | +104.5% | -38.0% | +142.5% | +113.7% |
| 3Y | +156.8% | -65.5% | +222.2% | +180.6% |
| All | +148.8% | -90.7% | +239.5% | +221.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling