+92.9%
FTNT vs MET
+25.8%
+67.1%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +0.4% | -2.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.5% | +0.4% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +0.5% | -3.5% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +11.6% | -4.0% | +5.3% |
| 6M | +87.0% | +40.8% | +46.2% | +73.2% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +25.7% | +70.9% | +87.2% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +24.4% | +68.6% | +84.6% |
| All | +92.9% | +25.8% | +67.1% | +84.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling