+162.8%
FTNT vs MDLZ
+17.7%
+145.2%
-38.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | 0.0% | -1.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +1.9% | -2.0% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +0.4% | -3.4% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -0.6% | +8.2% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +87.0% | +14.7% | +72.2% | +79.8% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +18.0% | +78.6% | +86.6% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +4.1% | +88.8% | +90.1% |
| 3Y | +139.8% | -4.6% | +144.4% | +139.7% |
| All | +162.8% | +17.7% | +145.2% | +119.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling