+92.9%
FTNT vs MCK
+25.1%
+67.8%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +0.1% | -1.8% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -2.9% | +2.8% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +0.4% | -3.4% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +12.1% | -4.5% | +10.0% |
| 6M | +87.0% | -5.4% | +92.4% | +87.7% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +7.8% | +88.8% | +101.4% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +22.9% | +70.0% | +96.5% |
| All | +92.9% | +25.1% | +67.8% | +96.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling