+92.9%
FTNT vs KRMN
-43.1%
+136.0%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +2.6% | -4.3% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -11.8% | +11.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -3.0% | -43.0% | +40.0% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -28.8% | +36.4% | +7.6% |
| 6M | +87.0% | -66.3% | +153.3% | +89.8% |
| YTD | +96.5% | -51.8% | +148.3% | +90.6% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | -44.7% | +137.6% | +82.6% |
| All | +92.9% | -43.1% | +136.0% | +82.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling