+88.8%
FTNT vs HTZ
-47.2%
+136.0%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.3% | -1.4% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -5.8% | +7.5% | -13.3% | -5.5% |
| 30D | -4.8% | +47.4% | -52.2% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -54.9% | +59.3% | +4.4% |
| 6M | +88.8% | -47.0% | +135.8% | +80.8% |
| All | +88.8% | -47.2% | +136.0% | +80.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling