+92.9%
FTNT vs EOG
+28.1%
+64.9%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.1% | -1.7% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +1.5% | -1.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +2.9% | -5.9% | -2.8% |
| 3M | +7.6% | +8.7% | -1.1% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +87.0% | +12.9% | +74.1% | +87.5% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +43.8% | +52.7% | +97.8% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +27.1% | +65.9% | +88.1% |
| All | +92.9% | +28.1% | +64.9% | +88.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling