+141.6%
FTNT vs ENTG
+48.2%
+93.4%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.4% | -1.5% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +8.9% | -7.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -0.8% | -3.4% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +13.6% | +6.6% | +7.1% | +10.7% |
| 6M | +87.6% | +22.1% | +65.5% | +75.7% |
| YTD | +98.0% | +70.2% | +27.8% | +71.2% |
| 1Y | +96.9% | +76.7% | +20.2% | +67.4% |
| All | +141.6% | +48.2% | +93.4% | +117.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling