+92.9%
FTNT vs ENPH
-2.4%
+95.4%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -1.4% | -0.4% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -3.0% | -10.8% | +7.9% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -33.8% | +41.4% | +10.1% |
| 6M | +87.0% | -16.1% | +103.1% | +87.1% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +13.4% | +83.1% | +88.6% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | -2.6% | +95.5% | +87.8% |
| All | +92.9% | -2.4% | +95.4% | +87.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling