+92.9%
FTNT vs CLSK
+36.0%
+56.9%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +6.8% | -8.5% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +7.7% | -7.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +12.2% | -15.2% | -3.6% |
| 3M | +7.6% | -15.5% | +23.1% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +87.0% | +39.3% | +47.6% | +81.8% |
| YTD | +96.5% | +35.1% | +61.5% | +89.2% |
| 1Y | +92.9% | +34.0% | +58.9% | +92.9% |
| All | +92.9% | +36.0% | +56.9% | +92.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling