+88.8%
FTNT vs CLF
+10.5%
+78.3%
-10.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.8% | -1.8% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -5.8% | +7.6% | -13.4% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -1.2% | -3.6% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -13.4% | +17.8% | +7.0% |
| 6M | +88.8% | +15.4% | +73.4% | +88.7% |
| All | +88.8% | +10.5% | +78.3% | +88.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling