+96.9%
FTNT vs ALHC
-19.3%
+116.2%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.2% | +3.0% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -4.1% | +5.9% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -5.4% | +1.2% | -4.5% |
| 3M | +13.6% | -32.1% | +45.7% | +13.2% |
| 6M | +87.6% | -28.5% | +116.1% | +88.7% |
| YTD | +98.0% | -34.0% | +132.0% | +99.3% |
| 1Y | +96.9% | -20.9% | +117.9% | +94.4% |
| All | +96.9% | -19.3% | +116.2% | +94.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling