+295.2%
FTI vs NIO
-62.6%
+357.8%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -1.6% | +1.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -13.0% | +18.3% | +6.1% |
| 30D | +15.3% | -18.3% | +33.6% | +16.7% |
| 3M | +15.8% | -33.2% | +49.0% | +18.6% |
| 6M | +22.6% | -21.5% | +44.1% | +23.6% |
| YTD | +79.5% | -25.5% | +105.0% | +81.5% |
| 1Y | +102.0% | -38.0% | +140.0% | +106.1% |
| All | +295.2% | -62.6% | +357.8% | +309.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling