+4.9%
FSLR vs NIO
-37.4%
+42.3%
-37.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -0.3% | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +6.8% | -6.7% | +13.5% | +7.9% |
| 30D | -14.7% | -20.0% | +5.3% | -11.8% |
| 3M | -22.6% | -30.5% | +7.9% | -18.2% |
| 6M | +12.7% | -20.7% | +33.4% | +15.3% |
| YTD | -18.4% | -25.7% | +7.3% | -14.9% |
| 1Y | +4.9% | -38.6% | +43.5% | +17.2% |
| All | +4.9% | -37.4% | +42.3% | +17.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling