+201.1%
FROG vs TMF
-42.2%
+243.3%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +0.4% | -3.7% | -3.4% |
| 7D | -11.3% | -1.4% | -9.8% | -11.1% |
| 30D | +3.6% | -2.8% | +6.5% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -10.9% | +12.6% | +3.0% |
| 6M | +123.5% | -21.3% | +144.8% | +129.2% |
| YTD | +40.2% | -15.9% | +56.1% | +42.9% |
| 1Y | +81.0% | -15.7% | +96.7% | +84.1% |
| All | +201.1% | -42.2% | +243.3% | +194.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling