+208.6%
FROG vs SM
-6.8%
+215.4%
-49.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | -2.5% | -0.8% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -11.3% | +0.1% | -11.4% | -11.3% |
| 30D | +3.6% | +26.3% | -22.7% | +0.4% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +8.7% | -7.0% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +123.5% | +51.7% | +71.8% | +109.2% |
| YTD | +40.2% | +99.0% | -58.8% | +25.4% |
| 1Y | +81.0% | +34.6% | +46.4% | +71.7% |
| All | +208.6% | -6.8% | +215.4% | +181.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling